I’m not creative. “Nancy” is almost naturally ambigrammable (so much so that I devised it while showering), and “Corrie #2” is just a variation of the first one.
i got excited about ambigrams reading Angels and Demons, where they had pretty cool ambigrams, but made Dan Brown made it so mystical and hard to generate that their existence proved the the existence of the illuminati.
And you say that you aren’t creative…
— Corrie @ July 5, 2006, 11:03 am (PT)
I’m not creative. “Nancy” is almost naturally ambigrammable (so much so that I devised it while showering), and “Corrie #2” is just a variation of the first one.
— James @ July 5, 2006, 12:23 pm (PT)
Can you make an ambigram of Jonathan (my nephew)? What about Bob? Hee hee – I recently watched “What about Bob.” It was funny.
— karen @ July 10, 2006, 12:41 pm (PT)
i got excited about ambigrams reading Angels and Demons, where they had pretty cool ambigrams, but made Dan Brown made it so mystical and hard to generate that their existence proved the the existence of the illuminati.
then i found an automatic generator on line
http://ambigram.matic.com/ambigram.htm
that takes the magic out of it.
umop apisdn is really cool though i’ve never seen that.
it’s a shame things didn’t work out with the nancy. talk about fate not working out.
— ben @ October 22, 2006, 1:42 pm (PT)